I’ve reviewed 13 whiskies this week, from 10 bottlers and always in a direct comparison between similar vintages / ages. It was more or less an experiment. Most bloggers (like me) do one whisky at a time, but others (most notably Serge) totally rely on direct comparisons. I’m not saying one method is better than the other, but I’d like to share some thoughts. Feel free to comment.

Comparisons highlight the differences

True enough: whenever you try similar whiskies head-to-head, the differences stand out more . However I’m not sure this is an advantage. Of course it makes...